Psyfield

    简 繁

    Topics

    All terms About

    Downward arrow technique

    箭头向下技术

    Technique
    Also called
    downward arrow, downward arrowing

    What is the downward arrow technique?

    The downward arrow technique is a common way to identify core beliefs in cognitive therapy: starting from an automatic thought, the therapist keeps asking what it means to the person until reaching a belief with no deeper meaning beneath it.[1] Beck and colleagues first mentioned it in 1979, and Burns elaborated it in 1980.[1]

    And what would that mean?

    Origins, data and limits

    Schematic; the scene is fictional. Bars drawn to scale.

    Select a box for details.
    Schematic. At the top, one round of downward arrow questioning: from an automatic thought, each level asks what it would mean if true, down to a core belief. Below, where the technique comes from, data from a large study (bars drawn to scale), the probability chain it is often confused with, and its limits. Select a part for details. Select a part for details
    Schematic. At the top, one round of downward arrow questioning: from an automatic thought, each level asks what it would mean if true, down to a core belief. Below, where the technique comes from, data from a large study (bars drawn to scale), the probability chain it is often confused with, and its limits. Select a part for details. Save as image (PNG)

    This figure image is licensed CC BY 4.0: reuse it with credit and a link back to this page. How to reuse

    Embed this figure

    Copy the HTML below; the image and the credit both link back to this page.

    Key points

    • An online CBT program has users start from an automatic thought they recorded, answer “What does that mean to me?” repeatedly, write down the core belief, then challenge it.[2]
    • When 1,813 users’ core beliefs from the program were coded, the most common themes were global self-evaluation (such as “I am useless”), attachment and competence, together about 72%.[2]
    • Therapists usually work with situational automatic thoughts first and with core beliefs later in treatment; core beliefs are so entrenched that they almost never change after one session.[1]
    • A separate cumulative probability technique in anxiety treatment asks how likely a feared outcome is: list each step it requires, estimate each one’s probability, then judge how likely all are.[3]

    An example

    Jay invites two friends to his birthday dinner, and both say they are busy. He keeps thinking, “They don’t want to see me.” His therapist asks, “If so, what would that mean to you?” “That I don’t matter to my friends.” “And what would that mean?” “That I’m unlikable.” The therapist doesn’t argue but notes it to examine later.

    Misreadings and limits

    The technique uncovers a belief; it does not prove it. The core belief it reaches is then challenged.[2] Evidence is also limited: cognitive therapy as a whole has many randomized trials, but single strategies are rarely tested on their own,[1] and the first large study analyzed only the beliefs the technique produced, not outcomes.[2]

    Sources

    1. 1 Wenzel, A. (2012). Modification of core beliefs in cognitive therapy. In I. R. de Oliveira (Ed.), Standard and innovative strategies in cognitive behavior therapy (pp. 17–34). InTech. doi:10.5772/30119
    2. 2 Millings, A., & Carnelley, K. B. (2015). Core belief content examined in a large sample of patients using online cognitive behaviour therapy. Journal of Affective Disorders, 186, 275–283. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.044
    3. 3 Gangemi, A., Gragnani, A., Dahò, M., & Buonanno, C. (2019). Reducing probability overestimation of threatening events: An Italian study on the efficacy of cognitive techniques in non-clinical subjects. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 16(3), 149–155. View source

    Last checked against sources: October 28, 2026